<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing DateTime.Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lesnikowski.com/blog/index.php/testing-datetime-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lesnikowski.com/blog/index.php/testing-datetime-now/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=testing-datetime-now</link>
	<description>.Net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:14:34 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Missal</title>
		<link>http://www.lesnikowski.com/blog/index.php/testing-datetime-now/comment-page-1/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Missal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesnikowski.com/blog/?p=480#comment-694</guid>
		<description>Moles can intercept static methods like DateTime.Now (like TypeMock Isolator), but you&#039;re better off abstracting it so you don&#039;t have to rely on those tools. It will just make your code more robust if you can design it without those tools.

This is a fine example and there are others too that all you to work with DateTime without relying on the static Now property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moles can intercept static methods like DateTime.Now (like TypeMock Isolator), but you&#8217;re better off abstracting it so you don&#8217;t have to rely on those tools. It will just make your code more robust if you can design it without those tools.</p>
<p>This is a fine example and there are others too that all you to work with DateTime without relying on the static Now property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel Lesnikowski</title>
		<link>http://www.lesnikowski.com/blog/index.php/testing-datetime-now/comment-page-1/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel Lesnikowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesnikowski.com/blog/?p=480#comment-693</guid>
		<description>1. You need to have Pex installed.
2. Is it simple to revert Mole to the original behavior?
3. Does it happen automatically?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. You need to have Pex installed.<br />
2. Is it simple to revert Mole to the original behavior?<br />
3. Does it happen automatically?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz Wisniewski</title>
		<link>http://www.lesnikowski.com/blog/index.php/testing-datetime-now/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Wisniewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesnikowski.com/blog/?p=480#comment-692</guid>
		<description>It is easier to use Moles (http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/moles/) from MS RiS, which are part of Pex (http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/pex/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is easier to use Moles (<a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/moles/" rel="nofollow">http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/moles/</a>) from MS RiS, which are part of Pex (<a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/pex/" rel="nofollow">http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/pex/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
